Fathom vs Fireflies for PR Agency Media and Client Calls
A PR agency's calls split into two very different registers: the internal or client-facing narrative call, where a spokesperson's exact phrasing on a sensitive topic matters enormously, and the media pitch call, fast, high-volume, often just confirming a journalist's interest before moving to the next name on the list.
Fathom vs Fireflies for strategic pr & communications agencies really comes down to whether your agency needs deep search across a large volume of quick media conversations, or precise, defensible capture of a smaller number of high-stakes narrative and messaging calls.
Most agencies eventually need both, which is why the useful question isn't which tool wins outright but how you'd configure either one differently for the two very different jobs.
Vendors Covered in this Article
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Two call types, two different capture needs
Media pitch calls are high-volume and short: an account executive confirms interest, sends a follow-up, moves on. What matters is a quick, accurate log across dozens of these a week, so nothing falls through when a journalist says yes and then goes quiet.
Narrative and messaging calls are the opposite: fewer of them, but every word can matter, especially when a client is working through how to phrase a public statement on something sensitive. Precision here beats volume.
Fathom for high-volume media outreach tracking
An account executive running dozens of media pitch calls a week benefits from Fathom's speed: a fast, clean log of who said what, turned quickly into an updated media list, without the overhead of building a deeply searchable archive for calls that are largely transactional.
Fireflies for messaging calls that get revisited later
A client's exact phrasing during a messaging or narrative-development call often needs to be checked again weeks later, when a spokesperson is preparing for an interview or a statement needs updating. A searchable transcript lets a strategist confirm precisely what was agreed on, rather than working from a summary that may have softened or generalized a carefully chosen phrase.
Tradeoffs between the two approaches for a mixed workload
Most agencies run both call types simultaneously, which means the real decision is less about picking one tool and more about setting different expectations for different call types within whichever tool you choose. Treat media pitch calls as disposable after a short window; treat narrative and messaging calls as a durable record worth keeping and tagging carefully, since the cost of losing precise language is much higher on the second type. Write that distinction into a short internal guideline rather than leaving it to each account lead's individual judgment.
A common mistake: applying pitch-call urgency to a crisis call
In the rush of daily pitch volume, it is easy to treat a client crisis call with the same light-touch capture as a routine media outreach call. That is exactly backward. A crisis communications call, where the agency and client work out exactly what will and won't be said publicly, deserves the most careful, precise capture of any call type an agency runs, since a misremembered detail here can become a public misstatement. Slow down deliberately on these calls, even when everything else that day is moving fast.
What to check before standardizing across the agency
Confirm client consent practices for recording narrative and crisis calls specifically, since clients are often more sensitive about these than about routine status updates. Check whether the tool lets you set different retention or visibility rules for different call types. And build a habit of having account leads flag any call where exact wording matters, so it gets the deeper search and tagging treatment rather than getting lost in pitch-call volume.
Run through these checks before choosing a tool:
- Confirm that clients consent to recording narrative and crisis calls specifically, since they are often more sensitive about these than about routine status updates.
- Check whether the tool lets you set different retention or visibility rules for media pitch calls and for narrative and messaging calls.
- Ask account leads to flag any call where exact wording matters, so it gets the deeper capture and tagging it deserves.
- Treat media pitch calls as disposable after a short window, and narrative and messaging calls as a durable record worth tagging carefully.
Where quota data fits an agency's own new-business pipeline
Roughly 22% of B2B sellers hit quota in a recent industry dataset1, a figure worth keeping in mind when a business development lead is pursuing new retainer clients on top of running the agency's day-to-day account work. Treating a searchable record of past new-business calls as a resource, what worked in a pitch that converted, what a prospect objected to, gives a small agency's limited BD hours a better shot at hitting that target than starting from a blank page each time.
A worked example: reusing what worked in a past pitch
Say a new-business call goes well and the prospect signs. Six months later, a similar prospect in a different sector needs a similar pitch. Searching back through the original call for the framing that actually landed, not just the final proposal document, gives the business development lead a genuine starting point instead of writing the pitch from scratch, and a genuine sense of which parts of the story to keep versus adapt for a different industry.
What Good Looks Like
Good conversation capture for a PR agency means a client's exact messaging language stays precisely intact and findable, while high-volume media outreach stays fast and organized without unnecessary overhead.
Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)
How to Get Started
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
For an agency running high volumes of media outreach sequences, a tool built for multichannel outreach like lemlist keeps pitch follow-ups organized alongside your call log.
Once an agency manages client relationships, campaign history and media contacts together, a shared CRM like HubSpot keeps that record in one place instead of scattered spreadsheets.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should we record media calls with journalists directly?
Be cautious here. Many journalists expect informal, off-the-record conversation norms, and recording without clear disclosure can damage a relationship. If you do record, disclose it clearly and get explicit agreement first, and default to not recording unless there's a clear reason to.
How long should we keep narrative and messaging call transcripts?
Longer than routine pitch calls, generally, since messaging language often gets revisited well after the original call. Align retention with how long the underlying campaign or client relationship is active, and check with the client if they have their own preferences about how long sensitive conversations are kept.
Is search really necessary for a small agency with few clients?
For a small agency, fast, accurate capture matters more than deep search across a large archive, since there's less volume to search through. As client and campaign count grows, the searchable-library benefit grows with it, particularly for narrative work that spans months.
Sources
Where we quote a benchmark, we show its source. Other figures in this guide are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.
- Percent of B2B sellers hitting quota (Ebsta dataset). Ebsta x Pavilion 2025 GTM Benchmarks Report, 2025.
Related Guides
Crediting Growth on Existing Accounts at a PR Agency
New-business wins get credited loudly at a PR agency, but account growth rarely does. Here is how to fix that gap, and which tool enforces the fix.
Scratchpad vs Dooly for PR Agency New Business Pitches
A PR or communications agency wins retainers through pitch meetings and strategy conversations, not demos. See how Scratchpad and Dooly fit that cycle.
ZoomInfo vs Cognism When You Already Have a Media Database
PR agencies already pay for a media database. Here is how to decide whether ZoomInfo or Cognism is worth adding for new business, not journalist outreach.
Close or Pipedrive for a PR Agency's New Business Pipeline
How a strategic PR or communications agency should decide between Close and Pipedrive, from relationship-led new business to sudden crisis-comms inquiries.
Apollo vs ZoomInfo for PR Agencies: Title Freshness Over Size
Marketing leadership reshuffles every other quarter. Here's why title freshness, not database size, should decide Apollo vs ZoomInfo for a PR agency.
Clari vs Gong for PR Agencies: Catching Silent Churn Early
Why silent non-renewal, not lost new-business pitches, is the bigger forecasting risk for PR agencies, and how Clari and Gong each address it.