Why Contractors Say They Never Got Your Price Increase
A contractor tells your inside sales rep they never received the price increase notice, and the rep quietly assumes it's a negotiating tactic. Sometimes it is. Often the notice landed in a junk folder alongside every other supplier quote sent that morning, and the receivables conversation that follows never actually gets at the real cause.
InboxAlly and Mailreach approach that problem from opposite directions, and knowing which one you need means being honest about how far the damage has already gone.
Vendors Covered in this Article
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Approach one: monitor placement across your customers' providers
Mailreach checks where your mail actually lands, provider by provider, on a running basis rather than a single point-in-time snapshot. For a supplier whose contractor customers run everything from enterprise Microsoft tenants to small hosted Gmail accounts, that variety matters: a domain can be landing fine at one provider and quietly filtered at another, and a blended average across your whole customer list will hide the difference entirely from whoever is reviewing it.
The tradeoff is that monitoring tells you where you stand; it doesn't move a filtered domain back into the inbox by itself. If a customer segment has already stopped seeing your mail, you're reading a status report, not fixing anything, and the receivables team is still going to be fielding the same disputes while you watch the number.
Approach two: actively rebuild a domain that's already filtered
InboxAlly routes mail through a network of seed accounts that open and engage with it, which is the signal mailbox providers look for when deciding whether a domain deserves the primary inbox again. That's the right tool once price notices, statements, and quotes are genuinely landing in spam across a meaningful share of your customer base, not just the occasional account here and there that might just have an aggressive personal filter.
The tradeoff here is time and focus: a rescue works on the domain as a whole, so it's most useful when the problem is systemic rather than isolated to one customer's individual filter settings, which no outside tool can fix, since that's a setting only the customer controls on their end.
The tradeoff most suppliers get wrong: bundling receivables mail with marketing
Price increase notices and overdue statements are effectively receivables mail, they carry real financial consequences if a customer genuinely doesn't see them and a payment or a job schedule slips as a result. If that mail shares a sending domain with a broader marketing newsletter to every contractor you've ever quoted, including ones who haven't ordered anything in years, a cold marketing segment can quietly damage the domain the receivables team depends on every single billing cycle. Separating the two doesn't fix an existing reputation problem on its own, but it stops a marketing list from creating a brand new one while you're still working on the old one.
How to tell which approach you actually need
Pull open rates on your last few price notices, broken out by provider rather than blended into one number. If a couple of providers look weak while most look fine, that's a monitoring-and-segmentation situation, catch it with Mailreach before it spreads further into providers that are currently fine. If placement looks poor almost everywhere you check, across most of the providers your customer base actually uses, that's a domain-wide reputation problem, and InboxAlly is built for exactly that broader scenario rather than a narrower, provider-specific one.
What a receivables team should check before escalating a dispute
Before treating a "never received it" claim as a negotiating tactic, check placement for that specific send and that specific customer's provider rather than assuming the worst about the relationship. A pattern of the same complaint from customers on the same type of email plan, rather than isolated cases scattered across your book with no obvious connection, points to a domain issue worth fixing rather than a customer relationship worth pressuring over a payment. Getting this distinction wrong costs goodwill with customers who were telling the truth the whole time, and it can push a genuinely good account toward a competitor over a problem that was never actually theirs.
Before a receivables team escalates a never-received claim, run through these checks:
- Check placement for the specific send and that customer's mail provider before treating the claim as a negotiating tactic.
- Look for the same complaint from several customers on similar email plans, since a cluster points to a domain problem rather than isolated disputes.
- Break open rates on recent price notices out by provider instead of relying on one blended number that hides a weak segment.
- Confirm price notices and overdue statements leave from a domain separate from the marketing newsletter sent to every contractor you have ever quoted.
- Escalate to the sales rep only after placement checks rule out filtering, so the follow-up conversation addresses the real cause.
Where you should sit against the industry baseline
Open rates across all industries average 35.63 percent, per Mailchimp's published benchmark1. Transactional mail like a price notice or an overdue statement, sent to a customer actively doing business with you, should clear that baseline by a wide margin rather than sitting near it, since it's mail the recipient has a direct financial reason to open. A number close to that all-industry average on receivables-related mail specifically is worth investigating before the next round of price changes goes out and creates another wave of disputes your team has to work through one call at a time.
What Good Looks Like
A building material supplier verifies that price notices and statements reach contractor customers across every mail provider in its book, checked by provider rather than blended, with receivables mail kept separate from broader marketing sends.
Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)
How to Get Started
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
When receivables mail is landing in spam broadly rather than at one customer, InboxAlly rebuilds domain trust through engagement seed accounts rather than waiting it out.
Outreach to prospective contractor accounts fits lemlist's multi-channel cadences with warm-up built in, kept separate from existing customer mail.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do we know if a contractor is genuinely not seeing our emails versus stalling?
Check placement for that specific send and provider rather than taking the claim at face value either way. A pattern across several customers on similar mail plans points to a real deliverability issue, while an isolated claim from one account that otherwise responds normally is more likely exactly what it looks like.
Should price increase notices go out from the same address as routine order confirmations?
Keeping them on the same trusted transactional identity is usually fine, since both are mail a customer expects and needs to act on. The bigger risk is letting either one share infrastructure with a broader marketing newsletter, which behaves very differently in terms of engagement and can drag both down.
How often should we check deliverability if we're not seeing an obvious problem?
A monthly check is a reasonable baseline for a supplier with a large, varied contractor list, since providers can change filtering behavior without any warning. Increase that to weekly around a price change or a large mailing, when the cost of a missed message is highest and the volume of complaints would be hardest to untangle.
Sources
Where we quote a benchmark, we show its source. Other figures in this guide are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.
- Email Open Rate (All Industries). Mailchimp Email Marketing Benchmarks (data updated Dec 2023), 2023.
Related Guides
Sales Commission Questions Building Material Suppliers Ask First
Answers to the commission questions building material suppliers ask before choosing between QuotaPath and CaptivateIQ, from rebates to house accounts.
Criteria for Picking a Partner Tool as a Materials Supplier
A commercial building material supplier sells through both a dealer network and architect specification influence. These criteria decide which tool fits.
Clari vs Gong for Building Material Suppliers
Why quote volume misleads a building materials forecast, and how Clari's stage gates and Gong's call analysis each handle counter and bid business.
Stopping Contractor Accounts From Quietly Reordering Elsewhere
A contractor account doesn't cancel, it just starts calling a competing supplier for the next order. Compare Gainsight and ChurnZero for that exact problem.
Fathom vs. Fireflies for Building Material Suppliers
How commercial building material suppliers should weigh Fathom against Fireflies across contractor pricing calls and architect spec-in relationships.
A Building Materials Supplier's Worksheet for Picking Close or Pipedrive
A worksheet-style walkthrough for commercial building material suppliers comparing Close and Pipedrive across counter sales, contractor accounts, and reorders.