A Segmentation Worksheet for Lemlist vs Instantly in Commercial Solar
Developers, EPC partners, and commercial property owners each need a genuinely different opening line, and a single sequence written to cover all three usually reaches none of them well. Segmenting before you launch, not after, is what actually decides Lemlist vs Instantly for commercial solar and energy EPC work.
Skipping this step is a costly mistake in a category where each buyer type also has a different sales cycle length; a property owner who needed education first and a developer who needed speed and reliability both end up with the wrong message if the list was never actually split.
Vendors Covered in this Article
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Start the Worksheet: List Your Three Buyer Types Separately
Before opening either tool, write out three columns: developers who need financing and permitting partners, EPC partners who need subcontracted installation capacity, and commercial property owners who need a reason to consider solar in the first place.
Each column gets its own opening line, its own value proposition, and its own list, because a property owner evaluating solar for the first time and an EPC firm evaluating a subcontractor are answering completely different questions.
This worksheet doesn't need to be complicated to be useful; a simple spreadsheet with each buyer type's known contacts, their stage of consideration, and a note on what actually matters to them is enough to keep the segmentation honest as you build out sequences.
A simple spreadsheet version of the worksheet works like this:
- Create one column for each buyer type: developers, EPC partners and commercial property owners.
- Write a separate opening line and value proposition for each column, since each buyer is answering a different question.
- Build a separate list for each column instead of one shared list, so weak replies can be traced to a specific segment.
- Note each buyer type's typical sales cycle length and what that buyer needs to hear first, from speed and reliability to basic education.
Fill In the Developer Column
Developers care about execution reliability and speed, since a delayed project costs them financing terms and timeline commitments to their own investors.
This column's list tends to be short and identifiable, a known set of active developers in your service area, which points toward Lemlist's researched, per-contact approach: referencing a developer's actual project pipeline is a stronger opener than a generic capabilities pitch.
Because this list is short, it's worth updating it whenever a new project is publicly announced in your service area, rather than treating the developer column as a fixed list built once and reused indefinitely.
Fill In the EPC Partner Column
EPC partners are evaluating subcontractor capacity and reliability, and this list can run wider than the developer column since you're trying to become a known option across a broader set of firms rather than landing one specific relationship.
That broader reach is where Instantly's rotation across many warmed inboxes fits, letting you maintain steady outreach across a wider EPC network without concentrating risk on one sending account.
For this column, mentioning your actual installed capacity or crew availability tends to matter more than general capability claims, since EPC partners are essentially evaluating whether you can reliably deliver on a subcontracted scope.
Fill In the Property Owner Column
Commercial property owners are usually the least warmed audience of the three, often not actively considering solar until someone raises it, which means this column needs the most persuasive, education-forward messaging of the group.
Volume matters here too, since most property owners on any given list aren't ready to act, but the message itself needs to do real work explaining why now, which argues for combining Instantly's reach with genuinely researched copy rather than a generic template.
A short educational piece, a linked explainer or a case description in your own words rather than a stock brochure, tends to earn more trust from this audience than a straight sales pitch would at this early stage of their consideration.
Why Skipping the Worksheet Usually Shows Up as Weak Replies
A sequence built to cover all three buyer types at once tends to under-serve each one: too generic for the developer who wanted specifics, too aggressive for the property owner who wasn't ready, and not tailored enough for the EPC partner comparing subcontractors.
If reply rates across your solar outreach are weak overall, check whether the underlying list is actually segmented before concluding the tool or the copy is the problem.
A quick diagnostic is pulling reply rates by column rather than as one blended number; if one segment is dramatically weaker than the others, that's usually a targeting or messaging problem specific to that segment, not a tool problem affecting all three equally.
Updating the Worksheet as Your Pipeline Matures
A solar contractor's segment mix often shifts as the business grows: an early-stage shop might lean heavily on property owner education to build its first pipeline, while a more established one shifts weight toward developer and EPC relationships that produce larger, repeat projects.
Revisit the worksheet at least once or twice a year rather than treating it as a one-time setup exercise, since the right split between the three columns for a growing business rarely stays constant.
Tracking which column actually produced closed business over the past year, not just replies, is the clearest signal for where to shift outreach effort going forward.
What Good Looks Like
A solar or energy EPC contractor that handles this well never runs developers, EPC partners, and property owners through the same sequence, and reviews reply data by segment rather than as one blended number.
Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)
How to Get Started
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Lemlist fits the developer segment, where a shorter, known list benefits from researched, per-contact messages.
Apollo helps build out each segment's contact list, especially the broader EPC partner and property owner columns.
Instantly fits the broader EPC partner and property owner segments, where reach matters as much as depth.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can one tool handle all three buyer segments if the sequences are different?
Yes, using different sequences within the same platform for each segment is reasonable. The tool choice matters less than making sure each buyer type gets its own list and its own message; running one platform with three properly segmented sequences beats running two platforms with one generic message each.
Which segment should get priority if resources are limited?
That depends on your current pipeline, but developers and EPC partners tend to have shorter sales cycles once engaged, since they already understand the category, while property owners typically need more education before they're ready to act. A resource-constrained team often gets faster results focusing on developers and EPC partners first.
How do I know if my property owner list is genuinely cold versus just unready?
Look at engagement signals beyond replies, like whether recipients are opening messages or visiting a linked page even without responding. A genuinely cold list shows little to no engagement at all; an unready list shows some engagement without conversion, which suggests the timing or education angle needs work rather than the list itself.
About the numbers
This guide doesn't quote a sourced benchmark. Figures in it are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.
Related Guides
Structuring Commission for Commercial Solar and Energy EPC Sales
A milestone-by-milestone setup guide for commercial solar and energy EPC sales teams choosing between QuotaPath and CaptivateIQ.
Why a Stalled Solar Deal Might Just Be a Filtered Inbox
A facilities director who took a site walk goes dark, and nobody checks whether the proposal ever arrived. Use these criteria before you write the deal off.
Clari vs Gong for Commercial Solar & Energy EPC
An EPC deal can sit for a year on external approvals. Here's how to build a forecast around interconnection and permitting gates, and where Clari and Gong fit.
Fathom vs. Fireflies for Commercial Solar and Energy EPCs
Commercial solar and energy EPC firms comparing Fathom and Fireflies for site assessment debriefs, bid calls, and financing or PPA negotiations.
Turning a Finished Solar Project Into the Next One
A finished solar project should lead to an O&M contract and the next developer's next site. See whether Gainsight or ChurnZero actually helps a commercial EPC.
Highspot or Seismic for Solar and Energy EPC Proposals
Highspot vs Seismic for commercial solar & energy EPC, checked against the real risk: a proposal citing the wrong incentive program is worse than no proposal.