Scratchpad vs Dooly for RIA Prospect Pipelines
For a registered investment advisor, Scratchpad keeps active prospects visible in one place, and Dooly captures what a prospect says about goals and risk tolerance for compliance and the eventual proposal. New clients usually arrive by referral and take two or three discovery meetings, so a firm's CRM often tracks the process loosely.
Scratchpad and Dooly address two different pieces of that process: one keeps an advisor's active prospects visible in one place, the other makes sure what a prospect said about their goals and risk tolerance actually gets captured for compliance and for the eventual proposal.
Vendors Covered in this Article
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
How does RIA prospecting differ from outbound sales?
Most RIAs grow through warm introductions rather than cold prospecting, which changes what a healthy pipeline looks like. A prospect who was referred by an existing client typically expects a more personal process, several conversations rather than a single sales call, and an advisor juggling a dozen of these relationships at once needs a fast way to see where each one actually stands.
That structure means the value of any tracking tool here is less about speeding up outreach and more about not letting a warm referral go cold simply because the advisor was focused on existing clients that week. A referral source who introduces a prospect and never hears anything back tends to be more hesitant about the next introduction, which makes timely follow-up a relationship issue with the referrer, not just with the prospect.
Where Discovery Meeting Details Get Lost Before the Proposal
A discovery meeting typically covers a prospect's goals, time horizon, risk tolerance, and sometimes sensitive family or estate details, all of which need to be reflected accurately in the eventual investment proposal and, in many firms, retained as part of the advisor's own recordkeeping practice. If an advisor relies on memory or a paper notepad, that detail can drift or go missing by the time a proposal is drafted weeks later.
Dooly's note templates can be structured around a firm's own discovery checklist, capturing goals and risk tolerance as the conversation happens and linking it to the prospect's record, though any specific recordkeeping requirement should be confirmed with the firm's own compliance officer rather than assumed from a template.
Log these details after each discovery meeting:
- The prospect's goals and time horizon, so the proposal reflects what they actually said.
- Their risk tolerance, in the prospect's own words where possible.
- Sensitive family or estate details, stored according to the firm's own compliance practices.
- Any recordkeeping the firm must retain, confirmed with the compliance officer rather than assumed from a template.
How can an advisor track several prospects at once?
An advisor with ten or twelve active prospects at different stages, first meeting, sent a proposal, awaiting a decision, benefits from a single grid view rather than opening each record separately to check status before a follow-up call. Scratchpad's bulk editing suits the small, frequent updates a referral-driven pipeline needs, logging a follow-up call or updating a next step in the time between client meetings rather than as a separate task.
A managing partner overseeing several advisors can use the same grid to see, firmwide, which referred prospects have gone quiet longer than the relationship warrants, without asking each advisor individually where things stand.
What Neither Tool Replaces
Neither Scratchpad nor Dooly determines what information a firm is required to document about a prospective client's investment objectives, or how long that documentation needs to be retained. Those questions depend on the firm's own regulatory obligations and should go to the firm's compliance officer or outside counsel, not be inferred from how a CRM template happens to be structured.
What the tools can do is make sure whatever the firm's own process requires actually gets captured consistently, rather than depending on which advisor happened to take good notes that day and which one was rushed between back-to-back meetings.
A Short Checklist Before Adopting Either Tool
First, check whether discovery meeting details currently survive from the first conversation to the final proposal, or whether prospects are routinely re-asked the same questions. If details get lost, that points to Dooly. Second, check whether advisors can see their full active prospect list in one place, or whether checking status means opening several records individually. If it takes several clicks, that points to Scratchpad. Third, confirm with compliance that either tool's note-taking fits inside the firm's existing recordkeeping process rather than creating a second, inconsistent record alongside it. A firm that skips this last step risks ending up with two versions of the same client conversation, neither of which is clearly the record of note.
What Good Looks Like
A well-run prospect pipeline has every active referral's stage and next step current, with discovery meeting details captured consistently enough that no proposal depends on one advisor's memory of a conversation from weeks earlier.
Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)
How to Get Started
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Dooly satisfy an RIA's recordkeeping obligations around client suitability?
Dooly is a note-taking and CRM sync tool, not a compliance system, so whether its records satisfy a specific regulatory requirement is a question for the firm's own compliance officer, not something to assume from the product itself.
How does Scratchpad help when most prospects come from referrals rather than outbound lists?
Its grid view is about tracking status and next steps across active prospects regardless of source, so it helps a referral-driven advisor the same way it helps a quota-carrying rep: fewer stale records, faster updates between meetings.
Should a solo advisor bother with either tool, or is a spreadsheet enough?
A well-kept spreadsheet is often enough for a solo advisor with only a handful of active prospects. The case for either tool grows once concurrent prospects are numerous enough that manual tracking starts costing real time.
About the numbers
This guide doesn't quote a sourced benchmark. Figures in it are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.
Related Guides
ZoomInfo vs Cognism Under an RIA's Marketing Rule Review
A compliance-first look at ZoomInfo versus Cognism for RIAs, where every prospecting call has to clear the marketing rule before it clears sales.
Commission Software for RIAs Paying Off an AUM Grid
Advisor payouts run off a grid tied to assets under management that move daily. Here is how QuotaPath and CaptivateIQ differ on modeling that, and the fit.
Close or Pipedrive for a Registered Investment Advisor's Pipeline
A compliance-first checklist for registered investment advisors weighing Close against Pipedrive, covering call recording, retention, and referral tracking.
Fathom vs Fireflies for RIAs: Recordkeeping-First Checklist
A recordkeeping-focused checklist for registered investment advisors weighing Fathom against Fireflies for prospect and client meetings.
Onboarding a New RIA Client Without Missing a Compliance Step
A compliance checklist and common pitfalls for onboarding new RIA clients, from custodian transfer to suitability documentation.
Deliverability for RIAs: Where Compliance Meets Inbox Placement
A registered investment advisor's client statements and prospecting mail both depend on clean deliverability. InboxAlly vs. Mailreach compared.