A Worksheet for Specialty Asset-Based Lenders Choosing Close or Pipedrive
Most specialty asset-based lenders fit Pipedrive best, because deal flow arrives through referral partners such as accountants, attorneys, turnaround advisors and investment bankers, not cold calling. Work through this worksheet with your originations team, row by row, to confirm which CRM fits that referral-driven reality.
Vendors Covered in this Article
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
Row 1: map where your last ten deals actually came from
Pull your last ten closed or active deals and trace each one back to its source: a specific referral partner, an existing borrower relationship, or direct outreach. Most specialty lenders find the overwhelming majority trace back to a small set of referral partners, not cold outbound. If that matches your worksheet, the CRM's real job is tracking and nurturing those referral relationships, not powering high-volume calling, which points toward Pipedrive over Close as the core tool.
Row 2: how do you currently track referral partner relationships?
If the honest answer is "a few people know the key contacts personally," that's a real risk, not just a process gap. A referral partner relationship that lives in one originator's head disappears if that originator leaves. Pipedrive's account records, with custom fields for referral volume, deal types typically sent, and last-contact date, give you a structured way to see which partner relationships are strong and which have gone quiet, independent of any one person's memory.
Row 3: how long does a typical deal take from referral to funding?
Specialty finance underwriting, including a field exam and a full review of the borrowing base, routinely takes longer than a typical B2B sale. Average B2B sales cycles for new business run around 91 days1, and many asset-based lending deals run past that once field exam scheduling and diligence are factored in. That length favors a stage-based tool like Pipedrive, where a deal's current stage, term sheet, diligence, field exam, closing, is visible at a glance rather than buried in call notes.
Row 4: how do you re-engage a referral partner who's gone quiet?
A referral partner who sent you two deals last year and none this year isn't necessarily upset, they may just not have had a fitting situation cross their desk, or they may have started sending deals elsewhere. Either way, a proactive check-in beats waiting to find out. Set a reminder tied to each partner's typical referral cadence, so a 12-month gap for a partner who used to refer quarterly triggers a flag well before a full year has passed silently.
Row 5: is any part of your pipeline genuinely cold outreach?
Some specialty lenders do run direct outreach to companies showing signs of capital need, alongside their referral network. If that's a real, meaningful part of your origination strategy, Close's calling tools are worth having for that specific slice of the business, even if referral partner management remains the primary motion running through a different, more structured pipeline.
Row 6: how should borrowing base and field exam timing show up in the pipeline?
Track borrowing base availability and field exam scheduling as their own stage or tagged status, distinct from general underwriting, since a deal waiting on a field exam date needs a different kind of follow-up (confirming the exam date, prepping the borrower) than a deal waiting on a credit committee decision. Lumping every kind of delay into one generic "underwriting" stage makes it hard for an originator to know what action, if any, is actually theirs to take this week.
Row 7: add it up
For most specialty asset-based lenders, the worksheet points clearly toward Pipedrive as the core tool: referral-driven deal flow, long underwriting cycles with distinct stages, and relationship management that benefits from structured account history over raw calling speed. Close earns a place only if genuine cold outreach to prospective borrowers is a real, ongoing part of how the business grows, which is the exception rather than the rule in this industry.
A referral-driven lender should build the CRM around these points:
- Account records for each referral partner, with fields for referral volume, typical deal types and last contact.
- A reminder tied to each partner's typical referral cadence so quiet partners get a proactive check-in.
- Separate stages for borrowing base and field exam timing, distinct from general underwriting.
- A referring-partner field on every deal so the source is documented cleanly.
- Closed deals archived into a filtered view so the working pipeline stays uncluttered.
Row 8: what to do with historical deals you've already closed
Don't let old, closed deals crowd out the active pipeline view your originators check daily. Archive closed deals into a separate view or filtered status, keeping them searchable for reference (a borrower may return for a new facility in a few years) without cluttering the working pipeline with records nobody needs to act on this week. Pipedrive's filtering makes this straightforward to set up once, and it's worth doing before your active pipeline grows large enough that finding a live deal among old ones becomes its own daily friction for an originator trying to see what actually needs a call or a follow-up email sent out today.
What Good Looks Like
Every active referral partner has a documented cadence and last-contact date, and every deal has a visible stage that distinguishes a borrowing-base or field-exam wait from a credit-committee wait.
Building The Capability (5-Stage Skill Ladder)
How to Get Started
Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It doesn't change what we recommend.
For a lender running genuine direct outreach to prospective borrowers alongside its referral network, Close's dialer supports that specific origination channel.
For tracking referral partner relationships and multi-stage underwriting through field exams and credit committee, Pipedrive's stage board gives originators a clear view of what's next.
Frequently Asked Questions
How often should originators check in with top referral partners?
It depends on the partner's typical referral cadence, but quarterly is a reasonable default for active partners, with a lighter touch for occasional ones. The goal is staying visible without becoming a nuisance, so basing the cadence on that specific partner's own history works better than a single fixed schedule for everyone.
Can Pipedrive track which referral partner sent each deal for commission or fee-sharing purposes?
Yes, through a custom field noting the referring partner on each deal, which most lenders also feed into a separate accounting process for any fee-sharing arrangement. The CRM's role is documenting the source cleanly, not managing the actual payment, which typically runs through a finance or accounting system.
Is Close ever worth using in this industry?
Mainly if you're actively building a direct-outreach origination channel alongside your referral network. For a lender relying almost entirely on referral partners, Close's calling speed doesn't address the actual bottleneck, which is relationship depth and timely follow-up with a relatively small, known set of partners.
Sources
Where we quote a benchmark, we show its source. Other figures in this guide are estimates or general guidance, so check them against your own numbers.
- Average B2B sales cycle length. Ebsta x Pavilion 2025 GTM Benchmarks Report, 2025.
Related Guides
Why Referral-Only Origination Stalls for Specialty Lenders
Turnaround advisors and accountants only send so many deals. See how ZoomInfo and Cognism help specialty lenders spot borrower distress directly.
Commission Questions Specialty Asset-Based Lenders Ask First
Direct answers for specialty asset-based lenders choosing between QuotaPath and CaptivateIQ, covering funded facility commission and early-default clawbacks.
Clari vs Gong for Specialty Asset-Based Lenders
Asset-based deals usually die in diligence, not in the sales conversation. How to forecast around underwriting risk, and where Clari and Gong fit.
Sales Enablement for Asset-Based Lending BDOs
Highspot vs Seismic for asset-based lenders, built around the real problem: BDOs explain borrowing base mechanics differently to every referral source.
Fathom vs. Fireflies for Specialty Asset-Based Lenders
Specialty asset-based lenders comparing Fathom and Fireflies for underwriting calls and covenant discussions that need to match the loan agreement.
Scratchpad vs Dooly for an Asset-Based Lender's Origination Pipeline
Answers to the questions specialty asset-based lenders ask about Scratchpad versus Dooly for tracking referral-sourced originations and covenant renewals.